Article Pulled from "New Scientist"

This Article got pulled from New Scientist’s online edition. Good reading…I enjoyed it.

How to spot a hidden religious agenda

Amanda Gefter New Scientist Sat, 28 Feb 2009 22:35 UTC

As a book reviews editor at New Scientist, I often come across so-called science books which after a few pages reveal themselves to be harbouring ulterior motives. I have learned to recognise clues that the author is pushing a religious agenda. As creationists in the US continue to lose court battles over attempts to have intelligent design taught as science in federally funded schools, their strategy has been forced to… well, evolve. That means ensuring that references to pseudoscientific concepts like ID are more heavily veiled. So I thought I’d share a few tips for spotting what may be religion in science’s clothing.

Red flag number one: the term “scientific materialism”. “Materialism” is most often used in contrast to something else – something non-material, or supernatural. Proponents of ID frequently lament the scientific claim that humans are the product of purely material forces. At the same time, they never define how non-material forces might work. I have yet to find a definition that characterises non-materialism by what it is, rather than by what it is not.

The invocation of Cartesian dualism – where the brain and mind are viewed as two distinct entities, one material and the other immaterial – is also a red flag. And if an author describes the mind, or any biological system for that matter, as “irreducibly complex”, let the alarm bells ring.

Misguided interpretations of quantum physics are a classic hallmark of pseudoscience, usually of the New Age variety, but some religious groups are now appealing to aspects of quantum weirdness to account for free will. Beware: this is nonsense.

When you come across the terms “Darwinism” or “Darwinists”, take heed. True scientists rarely use these terms, and instead opt for “evolution” and “biologists”, respectively. When evolution is described as a “blind, random, undirected process”, be warned. While genetic mutations may be random, natural selection is not. When cells are described as “astonishingly complex molecular machines”, it is generally by breathless supporters of ID who take the metaphor literally and assume that such a “machine” requires an “engineer”. If an author wishes for “academic freedom”, it is usually ID code for “the acceptance of creationism”.

Some general sentiments are also red flags. Authors with religious motives make shameless appeals to common sense, from the staid – “There is nothing we can be more certain of than the reality of our sense of self” (James Le Fanu in Why Us?) – to the silly – “Yer granny was an ape!” (creationist blogger Denyse O’Leary). If common sense were a reliable guide, we wouldn’t need science in the first place.

Religiously motivated authors also have a bad habit of linking the cultural implications of a theory to the truth-value of that theory. The ID crowd, for instance, loves to draw a line from Darwin to the Holocaust, as they did in the “documentary” film Expelled: No intelligence allowed. Even if such an absurd link were justified, it would have zero relevance to the question of whether or not the theory of evolution is correct. Similarly, when Le Fanu writes that Darwin’s On the Origin of Species “articulated the desire of many scientists for an exclusively materialist explanation of natural history that would liberate it from the sticky fingers of the theological inference that the beauty and wonder of the natural world was direct evidence for ‘A Designer'”, his statement has no bearing on the scientific merits of evolution.

It is crucial to the public’s intellectual health to know when science really is science. Those with a religious agenda will continue to disguise their true views in their effort to win supporters, so please read between the lines.

Oh, I just thought this was a cool picture and we should also get one done of Wallace which says something like “Still Underrated”. Either way I need to get a baseball cap that says this. I would wear it everyday.

The Last 20 minutes of work….

I have off tomorrow so I will do my “last 20 minutes of work” blog on Thursday. So, to sum up, the Homeless Advocacy Group is a probable green light but my involvement may be ending. This is unfortunate but I hope that it succeeds and that I can see some results and help out in the future.

That being said, I thought this was an interesting article:

Six sites that are the Galapagos for modern Darwins

The once-isolated islands of the Galápagos gave Charles Darwin insights into the dynamics of evolution that changed for­ever the way we think about the world. A century and a half later, scientists are still pursuing the ideas that drove him but are carrying these studies into a wide range of new locations—some exotic, some close to home.
“The evidence is overwhelming that evolution happened largely as Darwin proposed,” says Jerry Coyne, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Chicago and author of Why Evolution Is True. “Working through the engine of evolutionary change—natural selection—we can see evidence of animals’ and plants’ adapting to their environment before our eyes.” Such research took on cosmic importance recently when one of NASA’s Mars rovers found deposits of silica similar to those at the hot springs of Yellowstone Park. On earth such deposits typically contain remains of microscopic life.

Described below are some other places where modern followers of Darwin go for fresh inspiration about how life has adapted to nearly every environment on the globe.
25,000 feet under the sea: At the bottom of one of the world’s deepest ocean trenches, scientists have discovered a thriving colony of highly sociable fish—something they never expected to find there. Researchers had assumed that fish in such a harsh environment would be fragile, solitary, and motionless, conserving their energy due to a meager food supply. But high-definition submersible cameras captured images of abundant life nearly five miles beneath the surface of the Pacific. One camera spotted a cluster of 19 snailfish darting around bait like goldfish in a pond despite near-freezing cold, total darkness, and water pressure of five tons per square inch.

“We expected maybe one or two fish, but to see such a big group was amazing,” says Monty Priede, director of the University of Aberdeen’s Oceanlab, which specializes in robotic exploration of the deep sea. “And this is just the snailfish. There are also a lot of crustaceans, including prawns, living down there. We suspect there are half a million fish at these depths in each of the ocean trenches in the Pacific. Somehow they’ve adapted to the extreme cold and intense pressure.”
Oceanlab researchers made these discoveries last fall during a two-week expedition to the Japan Trench off the northeast coast of Japan, using submersible camera platforms engineered to withstand the extreme conditions. It was part of Oceanlab’s Hadeep project, a collaborative venture with the University of Tokyo investigating life in the so-called hadal region of the ocean (anything more than four miles below sea level). The newfound population of snailfish, which feed on tiny shrimp that scavenge detritus on the ocean floor, are believed to be the deepest living fish ever recorded.
Snailfish are thought to have colonized deep ocean trenches relatively recently, in evolutionary terms. Fish are dependent on oxygen that dissolves in the surface water and then sinks downward, but it is only within the past 70 million years that the deep seas have been oxygenated. “Snailfish are the most advanced of the fish. They produce relatively large eggs, and all of them have various kinds of parental care,” Priede says. “These explorations will help answer some tantalizing evolutionary questions. What are the limits of life? Is it possible to have living systems at even greater pressures? We’re just beginning to find out.”
An Abandoned Copper Mine: Land contaminated by runoff from industrial waste may soon be reclaimed by an unusual army of eco-warriors: metal-eating earthworms. Each deposit of metal at sites where these worms are found? creates a unique evolutionary event, yielding organisms that thrive in highly polluted environments.
Discovered in abandoned mines in England and Wales, these highly evolved superworms devour toxic heavy metals like lead, arsenic, and copper. “They seem to be able to tolerate high concentrations of metals, and exposure to the metal drives the worms’ evolution,” says Mark Hodson, a soil scientist at the University of Reading in England who unraveled the mechanisms that enable these worms to stomach normally lethal poisons.
DNA analysis of lead-tolerant worms unearthed in Cwmystwyth, Wales, revealed subtle changes in the worms’ genetic makeup that were induced by the metal. Researchers used sensitive X-ray technology to track how the worms metabolized metal particles one-thousandth the size of a grain of salt. “These earthworms have developed adaptive mechanisms for dealing with the soil pollution,” Hodson says. “When they ingest the soil, the metal accumulates in their tissues. But they have modified calcium pathways and secrete an enzyme that converts the metal into a less toxic form.” When the worms process the polluted soil, they excrete a slightly different version of the metal that is easier for plants to absorb. Eventually, Hodson says, “we might be able to recruit these earthworms to accelerate the remediation process: Just pop them in the soil and use them to clean up contaminated sites.”
The Wilds of New Guinea: Even though it is only about one-tenth the size of the United States, New Guinea has 7 percent of the world’s biodiversity, making the island a living laboratory for evolutionary biologists like Christopher Austin, who observes firsthand the adaptive mechanisms that spark the creation of novel species. In the past 20 years, Austin, a herpetologist at Louisiana State University’s Museum of Natural Science, has discovered nearly a dozen new species of lizard on the tropical island.
New Guinea’s unusually varied topography and climate have spawned a diverse array of habitats. They range from steamy lowland jungles, swamps, and floodplains to cloud forests, alpine grasslands, and glaciers capping mountains more than 16,000 feet high. The island harbors some of the world’s most unusual organisms, including kangaroos that live in trees and lizards that have green blood.

But New Guinea does not divulge its secrets readily. “There’s a very limited road system, and most of our travels are either by foot or by small airplane,” says Austin, who often spends weeks camped on the banks of the Sepik River in the north-central rain forest where he collects lizards, snakes, and frogs. Back in his lab at Louisiana State, he analyzes their genetic material to better understand how New Guinea’s many unique species diverged from their relatives and took on their distinctive forms.
Every new species that Austin discovers is another piece of the puzzle. And because of the looming threats created by global climate change, what he is uncovering in these remote rain forests could have far-reaching consequences. “We are in the midst of one of the most remarkable patterns of extinction that has ever happened,” he says. The current temperature spikes are destroying delicate ecosystems and threatening the survival of millions of species of plants and animals around the globe. “We need to understand the balance between extinction and speciation [the creation of new species] if we have any hope of salvaging this planet.”

The Canadian Arctic: In 2004 on a remote island in the Arctic wilderness, American scientists uncovered the remains of a fossil fish, Tiktaalik roseae, that first crawled on land about 375 million years ago. The find has deepened our understanding of this crucial evolutionary milestone and has illuminated the complex bodily changes that occurred when our distant ancestors moved out of the water. Tiktaalik is a strange creature, a combination of the limbs, skull, neck, and ribs of four-limbed animals and the more primitive jaw, fins, and scales of fish. It seems to be an intermediate step between fish and land-living animals, a key link in the evolutionary chain that led to amphibians, reptiles, and dinosaurs.

Researchers had conducted five annual fossil-hunting expeditions to Canada’s Ellesmere Island, 830 miles south of the North Pole, before they finally hit pay dirt five years ago. The conditions were harsh. Even in July, when the sun never sets, there were freezing temperatures, high winds, and nearly constant rain. One afternoon a member of the team spotted what looked like the snout of a flatheaded fish sticking out of a cliff.
“We figured we’d find the rest of the skeleton inside the mountain, which is exactly what happened,” says Neil H. Shubin, a team co­leader and an evolutionary biologist at the University of Chicago. “Even though we had suffered through the dreariest weather imaginable, we were elated beyond belief.”
The newly discovered fossil fish was a predator that could reach nine feet in length. It lived in shallow freshwater but was able, researchers believe, to pull itself out of the water and move around on land. (The name Tiktaalik means “large freshwater fish” in Inuktitut.) In the late Devonian period, nearly 400 million years ago, the area where the fossils were found was near the equator and had the temperate climate of the Amazonian rain forest. As the earth’s continental plates shifted, the land drifted north to the Canadian Arctic.
An analysis of Tiktaalik’s anatomy, completed this past October, indicates that the evolution of fins into sturdy limbs was accompanied by other anatomical innovations, including the rudiments of an articulated neck. “What allowed this lineage of animals to start to exploit the land was not just a matter of changing the fins to limbs but also the ability to move their head so they could navigate in shallow water,” says Ted Daesch­ler, a team coleader and a paleontologist at the Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia. “The fossil record has shed light on these major evolutionary shifts.”

The Chihuahuan Desert: Cuatro Cienegas, nestled in a valley surrounded by towering mountains, is an oasis in northern Mexico’s Chihuahuan desert, with more than 400 ponds and outlet streams fed by underground springs. Scattered over 200 acres, these pools of sparkling blue water are home to 70 species of plants and animals that are found nowhere else on earth. The area has become a mecca for scientists, in part due to the presence of stromatolites—reeflike structures created by blue-green algae that were abundant before the rise of multicellular animals. The unique ecosystems of Cuatro Cienegas may yield insights into what sparked the Cambrian transition, a pivotal time about 540 million years ago when simple, single-celled life developed into a wide variety of multicellular forms.
“There was a sudden and explosive diversification of animal life from some trigger that we haven’t as yet identified,” says Jack Farmer, a paleontologist at Arizona State University in Tempe. “Cuatro Cienegas may provide clues because the mechanisms that control the region’s bio­diversity may have operated during the Cambrian period.”
Scientists have found that about half of the organisms at Cuatro Cienegas are most closely related to marine life, even though the oases here have not been in contact with the ocean for tens of millions of years. “How do you get marine organisms so far from the ocean?” wonders James Elser, a biologist at Arizona State who makes regular trips to the site. “One theory is that they were deposited as the geological system formed and were trapped inside limestone until they were liberated eons later to form their own ecosystems. There’s a vestigial community—an experimental time machine—and studying them in the present might tell us something about the past,” Elser adds.

The Intensive Care Unit: In a perfect world, hospitals would strictly be places where the sick go to get well. Unfortunately, the hothouse environment of the hospital provides a window into an insidious side of evolution. All too often an epic battle for the survival of the fittest is taking place on almost every ward, transforming what should be sterile surfaces into incubators for antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
Because infectious microbes reproduce quickly and have enormous populations, changes in their genetic makeup over several generations can show up in just a few days. More­over, they are up against overwhelming natural selection pressures: powerful antibiotics that kill off all but the hardiest microbial mutants. This ratchets up the normally leisurely pace of evolution by many orders of magnitude. “It’s Darwinism at its finest,” says Carl Bergstrom, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Washington in Seattle who studies drug-resistant bacteria.
Hospital-acquired infections kill 90,000 people a year—more than HIV, breast cancer, and influenza combined. The magnitude of the problem has scientists like Bergstrom in a race against time as they attempt to harness what they know about evolutionary theory to slow the rate at which bacteria become resistant. Bergstrom’s tools are computers and mathematics, and the testing grounds for his ideas are the hospital intensive care units that provide him data.
“We keep inventing new antibiotics, but bacteria evolve resistance almost immediately, so we’re constantly playing catch-up,” he says. “How can we make the best use of the antibiotics we’ve got now? We’re using mathematical models to generate hypotheses about how we can shape and alter prescription practice to minimize or delay the evolution of resistance.”
There we go: an 8 minute blog.
Cheers,

Alfred Russel Wallace: Darwin’s Little Brother

I love this time of year. It is like my Christmas and Easter rolled into a big burrito of spicy science goodness. This and next month hold the birthdays of both Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace. Good stuff and the media is actually grasping hold of it (somewhat) and running with it. Amazingly, the library is actually out of all Darwin related books (and NOT the creationist ones). However, nothing is out on Wallace (and granted, we don’t have that much, but still).

Just a few things to think about though. Both were great scientists and suffered much for their art (good science is indeed an art) but while Darwin was largely…well…rich and had land and leisure. And, damnit, he took the leisure seriously and put it to some good use. If Darwin was a great cerebralist then Wallace thought and worked with his heart.

My boy Wallace, he was a middle son from a middle class (if that) family and had to work hard for prominance and work he did. He worked as a surveyor, civil engineer and lecturer all before his early twenties. He hoped to make his fortune in the Amazon by collecting unknown species and then selling the collections to a museum. Thus providing him with income and a bed of research materials to last his career. Hard years of collecting and disease led him to quite an array of specimens that, unfortunately, were later lost when his ship caught on fire on the way back to merry-old-England.

Living off of some publications and lectures from his travels (I believe he even published a travel book, these being very popular at the time), Wallace continued to plan for the future. He headed to the Malay Archipelago on a mission similar to the in the Amazon. Especially looking for Birds of Paradise. During these explorations he refined his thoughts about evolution and wrote on of his seminal works -“The Malay Archipelago” which extremely popular and went through several printings.

This is where things turned on poor Wallace. Unable to aquire a museum or academic post, Wallace was forced to write articles and grade examinations to make a living. While this seems pretty standard for most scientists now, the time period tendedto lend itself to “gentleman and gentlewomen” naturalists. Even lobbying from Darwin couldn’t get him a post but he did, after much work, get him supplied with a government pension for all of his previous service to state.

To shorten this up…Wallace began pissing people off. Why? Well, he got into some social issues. Mostly women’s sufferage and peace movements. This plus a healthy delving into spiritualism caused his eventual fall from scientific and societal grace. Very unfortunate.

Either way, at his death, the New York Times reported that Wallace was one of “the last of the giants belonging to that wonderful group of intellectuals that included, among others, Darwin, Huxley, Spencer, Lyell, and Owen, whose daring investigations revolutionized and evolutionized the thought of the century”.

So. Cheers, Alfred! We love you, you crazy, progressive, hard-nosed, sonofabitch and happy goddamned birthday!